A Brief Primer On The Worldviews Of Abortion
Take, for instance, this commentary on abortion from Pastor Matt Richard. This is powerful in its simplicity and I encourage you to bookmark and share this whenever and wherever you can!
A Brief Primer On The Worldviews Of Abortion
With respect to Abortion, there are two prevalent and opposing worldviews:
- Worldview #1 views the issue of Abortion 'exclusively' through the eyes of the mother (1 person).
- Worldview #2 views the issue of Abortion 'primarily' through the eyes of the baby (2 persons).
And so, for Worldview #1, Abortion is viewed as an asset because of what it does solely for the mother. Whereas, Worldview #2 views Abortion as a threat because of what it does primarily to the baby.
Now, for 'Worldview #1' to not trouble the conscience: 1) the baby in the womb must be dehumanized (i.e., be seen as a cluster of cells, parasite, curse, etc.). The baby must be seen as something that is disposable and morally inconsequential; 2) the reason for the Abortion must be framed within a noble cause (i.e., it saves the mother's life, it is a compassionate solution to rape, etc.). Once dehumanized and noble causation is reached, Worldview #1 can be viewed as morally good and the conscience relieved.
Problems arise, though, when Worldview #2 humanizes the child in the womb and asserts that the majority of abortions in America are 'not' done for noble causes but rather for social and economic reasons. In a word, Worldview #2 dismantles the presuppositions of Worldview #1 and pricks the conscience. Once pricked, those subscribing to Worldview #1 will push back to keep the conscience at peace to feel morally justified.
Keep in mind that Worldview #2 does not exclude the mother in its assessment. But instead, it views medical and moral issues through the lens of the baby first (i.e., the weaker) and the mother second (i.e., the stronger). Mark this; the strong always serve the vulnerable, which is exactly why Worldview #1 is morally suspect and deficient -- it fails to acknowledge the weak (i.e., baby) and only addresses the strong (i.e., mother). It only addresses 1 person. Whereas, Worldview #2 addresses 2 people - the vulnerable baby first and the stronger mother second.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for visiting A Lutheran Layman! Please feel free to leave a comment or a question since we do not exercise censorship. We've seen a similar policy with other blogs and it's worth repeating: Please act as if you're a guest in my home, and we'll get along just fine. I think anyone would agree that the kind of back-and-forth that is characteristic of blogs/chat forums and social media is becoming tiresome for all of us. Still, we should confess, edify, and love (and contend and defend when needed). Bottom line? Search the Scriptures! Apply Acts 17:11 to anything and everything you find here and, if you do happen to disagree with something you find here (which is certainly ok), or think I'm "irresponsible" and "wrong" for writing it, then please refute my position by supporting yours with Scripture and/or the Confessions. I don't think that's an unreasonable request, especially for those who identify themselves as "Christians" here, right? Besides, Proverbs 27:17 tells us "Iron sharpens iron, and one man sharpens another" and 2 Timothy 3:16 says, "all Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness." If you have an opinion that's great, I welcome it, but try to support it using God's Word. I mean, if the goal here is to help us all arrive at the truth of God's Word (myself included), then it should be easy to follow through on this one simple request (I'm talking to all you "Anonymous" visitors out there). Grace and peace to you and yours!